raytownonline_circle

Raytown current weather conditions


Click for Forecast

Weather Forecast

Partly Cloudy
Thursday 0%
High 71° / Low 44°
Partly Cloudy
Partly cloudy. High 71F. Winds W at 5 to 10 mph.
Clear
Friday 0%
High 75° / Low 46°
Clear
A mainly sunny sky. High near 75F. Winds WNW at 10 to 20 mph.
Clear
Saturday 0%
High 66° / Low 45°
Clear
Sunny skies. High 66F. Winds NE at 5 to 10 mph.
Clear
Sunday 0%
High 75° / Low 60°
Clear
Except for a few afternoon clouds, mainly sunny. High around 75F. Winds SE at 10 to 20 mph.
Partly Cloudy
Monday 20%
High 80° / Low 65°
Partly Cloudy
Partly cloudy skies with gusty winds. High near 80F. Winds S at 20 to 30 mph. Winds could occasionally gust over 40 mph.
Chance of a Thunderstorm
Tuesday 30%
High 75° / Low 64°
Chance of a Thunderstorm
Cloudy in the morning then windy with a few isolated thunderstorms late. High around 75F. Winds SSW at 20 to 30 mph. Chance of rain 30%.
Thunderstorm
Wednesday 80%
High 74° / Low 58°
Thunderstorm
Scattered thunderstorms in the morning becoming more widespread in the afternoon. A few storms may be severe. High 74F. Winds S at 10 to 20 mph. Chance of rain 80%.

Clark’s Appliances donated to REAP


DAILY CARTOON click to enlarge
ANDERTOONS.COM DAILY CARTOONS
=

Click on +1 button to tell Google you like RaytownOnline

Subscribe to RaytownOnline.com via Email

Enter your email address to receive emails of the latest local news articles on RaytownOnline.com.


Raytown Service Specialist donated to REAP





Kendra donated to Shepherd’s Center

Ads for Charity

Raytown Fire District response to the letter of declination.

fire_district_logo

 

Contact Matt Mace
Telephone 816-737-6034
Email mattm@raytownfire.com
Website Raytownfire.blogspot.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 16, 2013

   

STATEMENT REGARDING RAYTOWN FIRE/RAYTOWN EMS MERGER

During the meeting of the Raytown city council on October 15th, 2013, Alderman Charlotte Melson spoke
on behalf of the City’s EMS merger discussion committee. She stated that the EMS/Fire merger discussion
committee has decided that the merger is not advantageous to the city at this time and they will not be
moving forward.

The Fire District continues to believe that fire based EMS in our community would provide better value to
our citizens and improve service delivery. The Fire District presented a detailed proposal in May of 2013 to
substantiate this assertion. This proposal was developed with the cooperation of the City of Raytown, who
provided audited financial information. That information was utilized to develop the consolidation
proposal. In July of 2013, the city’s Fire/EMS merger discussion committee held their only public meeting
to discuss the proposal. At that meeting, officials from the Fire District were discouraged from participating
in the discussion regarding the proposal. In fact, city officials have avoided any discussion with the Fire
District regarding the details of the proposal.

Fire Board President Robert Palmer issued the following statement:

The Fire District was shocked and disappointed by Alderman Melson’s announcement at the council
meeting on Tuesday. We were given no notice that the statement was forthcoming and were provided
with a brief letter from Alderman Melson immediately after the meeting. The letter, which follows this
release, contains no explanation for the decision. The Fire Board is unsure of Alderman Melson’s motive,
be we are hopeful that Mayor Bower and the other aldermen will intervene and bring this issue in front of
the full board for a vote. Our citizens deserve the opportunity to have an issue of this importance discussed
in a public venue. We remain interested in cooperating with the city to improve the value and efficiency of
emergency service delivery in our community. Our door is, and will remain open when the city is ready to
have a substantive discussion regarding this issue.

For reference, the letter to the Fire District from Alderman Melson and the proposal from the Fire District
which was presented to the City of Raytown in May of 2013 are attached after this statement.

Leave a Reply